Reply to Powers
🚧 This page is incomplete. 🚧
The _replyPowers
function is responsible for sending execution data back to the Powers protocol after a law has been executed. This function is called internally by executeLaw
when there are execution targets to process.
Reply Process
1. Function Signature
function _replyPowers(
uint16 lawId,
uint256 actionId,
address[] memory targets,
uint256[] memory values,
bytes[] memory calldatas
) internal
2. Implementation Details
Parameters
lawId
: ID of the law being executedactionId
: Unique identifier for the actiontargets
: Array of target contract addressesvalues
: Array of ETH values to sendcalldatas
: Array of encoded function calls
Function Behavior
Cannot be overridden by implementing contracts
Sends data back to Powers protocol
Executes the actual calls through Powers
Execution Flow
1. Data Preparation
bytes32 lawHash = LawUtilities.hashLaw(msg.sender, lawId);
2. Powers Protocol Call
IPowers(payable(laws[lawHash].executions.powers)).fulfill(
lawId,
actionId,
targets,
values,
calldatas
);
Important Considerations
1. Data Validation
Arrays must have equal lengths
Targets must be valid addresses
Values must be appropriate
Calldata must be properly formatted
2. Gas Optimization
Minimize array sizes
Use efficient data structures
Batch related calls
Cache frequently accessed values
3. Security
Validate all inputs
Check permissions
Prevent reentrancy
Protect against manipulation
4. Error Handling
Handle failed calls
Validate return values
Provide clear errors
Maintain state consistency
Best Practices
Data Preparation
Validate all arrays
Check array lengths
Verify addresses
Format calldata properly
Execution Safety
Validate all inputs
Check permissions
Handle errors
Maintain consistency
Gas Optimization
Minimize array sizes
Use efficient structures
Batch related calls
Cache values
Security
Validate inputs
Check permissions
Prevent reentrancy
Protect against manipulation
Common Pitfalls
Array Mismatches
Unequal array lengths
Invalid array indices
Missing array elements
Incorrect array types
Gas Issues
Large array sizes
Inefficient structures
Unnecessary calls
Poor batching
Security Vulnerabilities
Missing validations
Permission issues
Reentrancy risks
State manipulation
Error Handling
Missing validations
Unclear errors
Incomplete handling
Silent failures
Example Usage
// Inside executeLaw function
if (targets.length > 0) {
_replyPowers(
lawId,
actionId,
targets,
values,
calldatas
);
}
Implementation Notes
Function Restrictions
Cannot be overridden
Must be internal
Must be called by executeLaw
Must validate inputs
Data Requirements
Valid law ID
Valid action ID
Matching array lengths
Valid addresses and values
Error Conditions
Invalid law ID
Invalid action ID
Array length mismatch
Invalid addresses or values
Success Conditions
All arrays valid
All calls successful
State updated
Events emitted
Last updated