Reply to Powers

🚧 This page is incomplete. 🚧

The _replyPowers function is responsible for sending execution data back to the Powers protocol after a law has been executed. This function is called internally by executeLaw when there are execution targets to process.

Reply Process

1. Function Signature

function _replyPowers(
    uint16 lawId,
    uint256 actionId,
    address[] memory targets,
    uint256[] memory values,
    bytes[] memory calldatas
) internal

2. Implementation Details

Parameters

  • lawId: ID of the law being executed

  • actionId: Unique identifier for the action

  • targets: Array of target contract addresses

  • values: Array of ETH values to send

  • calldatas: Array of encoded function calls

Function Behavior

  • Cannot be overridden by implementing contracts

  • Sends data back to Powers protocol

  • Executes the actual calls through Powers

Execution Flow

1. Data Preparation

bytes32 lawHash = LawUtilities.hashLaw(msg.sender, lawId);

2. Powers Protocol Call

IPowers(payable(laws[lawHash].executions.powers)).fulfill(
    lawId,
    actionId,
    targets,
    values,
    calldatas
);

Important Considerations

1. Data Validation

  • Arrays must have equal lengths

  • Targets must be valid addresses

  • Values must be appropriate

  • Calldata must be properly formatted

2. Gas Optimization

  • Minimize array sizes

  • Use efficient data structures

  • Batch related calls

  • Cache frequently accessed values

3. Security

  • Validate all inputs

  • Check permissions

  • Prevent reentrancy

  • Protect against manipulation

4. Error Handling

  • Handle failed calls

  • Validate return values

  • Provide clear errors

  • Maintain state consistency

Best Practices

  1. Data Preparation

    • Validate all arrays

    • Check array lengths

    • Verify addresses

    • Format calldata properly

  2. Execution Safety

    • Validate all inputs

    • Check permissions

    • Handle errors

    • Maintain consistency

  3. Gas Optimization

    • Minimize array sizes

    • Use efficient structures

    • Batch related calls

    • Cache values

  4. Security

    • Validate inputs

    • Check permissions

    • Prevent reentrancy

    • Protect against manipulation

Common Pitfalls

  1. Array Mismatches

    • Unequal array lengths

    • Invalid array indices

    • Missing array elements

    • Incorrect array types

  2. Gas Issues

    • Large array sizes

    • Inefficient structures

    • Unnecessary calls

    • Poor batching

  3. Security Vulnerabilities

    • Missing validations

    • Permission issues

    • Reentrancy risks

    • State manipulation

  4. Error Handling

    • Missing validations

    • Unclear errors

    • Incomplete handling

    • Silent failures

Example Usage

// Inside executeLaw function
if (targets.length > 0) {
    _replyPowers(
        lawId,
        actionId,
        targets,
        values,
        calldatas
    );
}

Implementation Notes

  1. Function Restrictions

    • Cannot be overridden

    • Must be internal

    • Must be called by executeLaw

    • Must validate inputs

  2. Data Requirements

    • Valid law ID

    • Valid action ID

    • Matching array lengths

    • Valid addresses and values

  3. Error Conditions

    • Invalid law ID

    • Invalid action ID

    • Array length mismatch

    • Invalid addresses or values

  4. Success Conditions

    • All arrays valid

    • All calls successful

    • State updated

    • Events emitted

Last updated